HOW DO YOU SPELL DESPERATION? G.O.P.
Want to know what desperation looks like?
Here’s what Bill Frist and Ken Mehlman sent out yesterday in a desperation email fundraiser. They’re scared to death that John Kerry and Ted Kennedy ponied up to elect Democrats.
Let’s see their $2 million, and raise them.
Have you got your checkbook out yet? Go to ActBlue.com here, here or here and make sure that our Democratic candidates don’t miss this “critical opportunity…to reverse the Bush Administration.”
And get ready to vote for “3 at the Buzzer” starting at 7 am eastern, Wednesday on www.johnkerry.com to really scare the Republicans.
8 Comments
New comments for this entry are closed.
And it’s no wonder that the Reposeurs are resorting to such desperation tactics this year, either. They’re in trouble and they know it.
By way of example, take a glance at these snipped excerpts from two articles currently on the AP newswire feeds:
-
(AP) The Democrats’ congressional campaign committees raised $15.5 million during the first 18 days of October, setting up their final push to reclaim both chambers. Republicans, meanwhile, raised $10.1 million for their candidates, continuing a pace that has lagged this election.
Republicans slightly beat the Democrats’ House committee but stumbled on the Senate side, where a $5.5 million fundraising disparity emerged during the Oct. 1-17 reporting period. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee raised $9.1 million; the National Republican Senatorial Committee raised $3.6 million.
“In the world series of fundraising, Senate Democrats just hit a grand slam in the bottom of the ninth,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the committee’s chairman, said in a statement. “The rapid rate at which Democrats are raising money is the latest evidence that Americans want change in the Senate.”
[snip]
[Full article here, among other places—http://tinyurl.com/wufjw—and note that the numbers cited above are only current through 10/18, and don’t include the most recent huge donations reported elsewhere on this site in the past week and a half.]
WASHINGTON, Oct. 27 — Corporate America is already thinking beyond Election Day, increasing its share of last-minute donations to Democratic candidates and quietly devising strategies for how to work with Democrats if they win control of Congress.
The shift in political giving, for the first 18 days of October, has not been this pronounced in the final stages of a campaign since 1994, when Republicans swept control of the House for the first time in four decades.
Though Democratic control of either chamber of Congress is far from certain, the prospect of a power shift is leading interest groups to begin rethinking well-established relationships, with business lobbyists going as far as finding potential Democratic allies in the freshman class — even if they are still trying to defeat them on the campaign trail — and preparing to extend an olive branch the morning after the election.
[snip]
An analysis by The New York Times of contributions from Oct. 1 to 18, the latest data available, shows that donations to Republicans from corporate political action committees dropped by 11 percentage points in favor of Democratic candidates, compared with corporate giving from January through September.
Republicans still received 57 percent of contributions, compared with 43 percent for Democrats, but it was the first double-digit October switch since 1994. “A lot will hold their powder for now,” said Brian Wolff, deputy executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. “But after the election, we will have a lot of new friends.”
[snip]
While Republicans and Democrats are feverishly soliciting contributions until Election Day, campaign finance reports filed this week provide a window into the final days of a raucous midterm election campaign. The analysis of 288 corporate political action committees, which have contributed more than $100,000 this election cycle, found that at least 65 committees had increased their ratio of contributions to Democrats by at least 15 percentage points, including Sprint, United Parcel Service and Hewlett-Packard.
[snip]
“The real story of the 2006 contributions is what happens in the early phase of 2007, with a change in party control,” said Bernadette A. Budde, senior vice president of the Business-Industry Political Action Committee. “There will be proverbial meet-and-greets all over town so we will have a sense of who these people are.”
Many of these meet-and-greet sessions will have a dual purpose: political action committees will offer contributions to help candidates wipe away debt their campaigns accrued during the race.
Spending in the midterm election campaign is forecast to reach $2.6 billion, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, including $1 billion from political action committees. While many business groups have been eager to appear as if they have been handily contributing to Democratic efforts, it was not until this month that the trend became apparent enough to quantify beyond party leaders or prospective committee chairmen.
Democrats who are not in tight races — or even standing for re-election in some cases — have seen their contributions increase more than some of those facing the most competitive contests. That is an easy way, lobbyists say, for political action committees to increase the share of their Democratic contributions, a percentage that is carefully tracked by party leaders when they reach the majority.
Representative Adam Smith of Washington, who leads a coalition of centrist Democrats, said he has detected a friendlier relationship with the business community in recent months, a welcome change from years of Republican rule when “Democrats were basically frozen out in every way.”
“I hope that the new Democratic majority will take a more open and cooperative approach,” Mr. Smith said in an interview. “I hope there won’t be a sense of, ‘Oh, you gave too much money to Republicans, so we’re not going to talk to you.’ ”
[Full article here, among other places—http://tinyurl.com/uo6w4—and note that corporations consider both contributions to non-threatened candidates facing future races and contributions to retire individual candidates’ campaign debts to be worthwhile investments of their political capital.]
-
money talks and elephants walk,
Otter
Yes, Otter and let’s hope elephants walk far, far away…
elephants will be stumbling on Nov 7, I believe.
Good post - good info in there!
Wish some of those spending habits and willingness to work with Dems hadn’t frozen us out of a fair or pro-position by the media in 2004.
Viacom’s Sumner Redstone said Bush was better for business, meaning media consolidation, and suppressed big stories. The GOP weren’t good for business, or anything else.
Read on DCP that Seattle Times dissed Cantwell and all the positions they shared in favor of endorsing her GOP opponent, because he favors repealing the estate tax. Choice. The more things change, they stay the same.
Let’s hope making relationships doesn’t mean K Street selling out.
In the movie “Elephant Walk,” didn’t they trample the plantation?
Excellent initiative! Let’s do this!
Go Dems!
Otter, thanks for the articles!
“Many of these meet-and-greet sessions will have a dual purpose: political action committees will offer contributions to help candidates wipe away debt their campaigns accrued during the race.”
This kind of bothered me the first time I saw the article. Maybe the candidates could do some kind of appeal to those who didn’t contribute during the campaign but voted for them. At least they would know it was a sure bet. And the candidates would not have to owe the PACs or other big contributors anything.
If I may put in a personal appeal for our local candidate, please consider voting for Tammy Duckworth (IL-6) when the “polls” open up November 1. She has received considerable financial support from JK, but she is losing in our district. As popular as she is with many of you, it is worth knowing she is getting creamed in T.V. ads in our district. The Republican candidate has effectively moved the debate from Iraq to taxes and immigration (the two ideal Republican talking points). When I phone bank, I am constantly asked about these two issues. The RNCC has bombed us with T.V ads in a 10 to 1 ratio. Duckworth has had so few ads on T.V, it is impossible for voters to really know that her opponent is lying about her position.
Send help and vote for Duckworth.
John Kerry made a terrible remark about soldiers in Iraq. He made it sound like only persons of low intelligence, misfits, would serve there.
John Kerry. You have betrayed us. If any candidate takes money from John Kerry, that candidate would also accept the 30 pieces of silver from Judas.
Kerry is going to hurt any candidate with whom he associates. Veterns and active duty soldiers are uniting AGAINST KERRY, and any candidate that teams up with John Kerry. If Kerry was now serving, we would want him to be gievn a dishonorable discharge. Or, since he seems crazy, maybe he would just get a Section 8.