How’s That Working Out?
Back in January, President Bush gave a nationally-televised speech laying out his “new” Iraq strategy, known as The Surge (or, alternately: The Same … Only More Of It). We’re now 6 months on, an appropriate time to look back on his words. Remember, he did this against the advice of the large majority of the uniformed military and with the support of Congressional Republicans. In his speech he said:
Our troops will have a well-defined mission: to help Iraqis clear and secure neighborhoods, to help them protect the local population, and to help ensure that the Iraqi forces left behind are capable of providing the security that Baghdad needs.
In an article headlined Iraq outposts plan may be flawed, the LATimes reports:
<!The neighborhood outposts that the U.S. military launched with great fanfare in Baghdad early this year were supposed to put more American patrols on the streets and make residents feel safer. But some soldiers stationed at the posts and Iraqis who live nearby say they are doing the opposite. [...]
“I just know it’s not much different than it was seven months ago,” said one junior officer in east Baghdad. “We are retaking the same ground every day.”
[Over] time, we can expect to see Iraqi troops chasing down murderers, fewer brazen acts of terror, and growing trust and cooperation from Baghdad’s residents. When this happens, daily life will improve, Iraqis will gain confidence in their leaders, and the government will have the breathing space it needs to make progress in other critical areas. [...]
To establish its authority, the Iraqi government plans to take responsibility for security in all of Iraq’s provinces by November. To give every Iraqi citizen a stake in the country’s economy, Iraq will pass legislation to share oil revenues among all Iraqis. To show that it is committed to delivering a better life, the Iraqi government will spend $10 billion of its own money on reconstruction and infrastructure projects that will create new jobs. To empower local leaders, Iraqis plan to hold provincial elections later this year. And to allow more Iraqis to re-enter their nation’s political life, the government will reform de-Baathification laws, and establish a fair process for considering amendments to Iraq’s constitution. [...]
We will use America’s full diplomatic resources to rally support for Iraq from nations throughout the Middle East. Countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and the Gulf States need to understand that an American defeat in Iraq would create a new sanctuary for extremists and a strategic threat to their survival. These nations have a stake in a successful Iraq that is at peace with its neighbors, and they must step up their support for Iraq’s unity government. We endorse the Iraqi government’s call to finalize an International Compact that will bring new economic assistance in exchange for greater economic reform. And on Friday, Secretary Rice will leave for the region, to build support for Iraq and continue the urgent diplomacy required to help bring peace to the Middle East.
In a large Sunday article, the Washington Post reported:
The Iraqi government is unlikely to meet any of the political and security goals or timelines President Bush set for it in January when he announced a major shift in U.S. policy, according to senior administration officials closely involved in the matter. As they prepare an interim report due next week, officials are marshaling alternative evidence of progress to persuade Congress to continue supporting the war.
Alternative evidence of progress? Zowee.
As for the diplomatic efforts, it’s patently obvious there’s been no successes there.
This has been a colossal, tragic failure, and everyone knows it. Now, we need to make sure that the growing ranks of GOP Congressmen that are expressing the need to change course put action behind their words and vote for real legislation that forces a change. Nothing less will do, and there’s no more time to wait. Lives are being lost every day to pursue this failed strategy, and we have a moral obligation to do everything possible to work for change. This is a human tragedy almost beyond imagining.

3 Comments
New comments for this entry are closed.
Great post.
I don’t claim to know all the ins and outs about the situation in Iraq, but it is obvious President Bush’s latest ‘strategy’ isn’t working. The latest disputes over the oil distributions are just one example of the inability of the Iraq government to pull together and compromise. The “surge” was to be a positive step forward and we Americans along with Congress were asked to have some patience. Well, two months to go and already there is talk that it will be impossible to measure the positive results of the surge by September. The good news is some Republicans are beginning to feel the heat of public opinion and have experienced an awakening of sorts. Republicans like Senator Lugar are speaking out against the war. The trouble is, Senator Lugar and others are not willing to end this mistake, but are calling for another strategy. Another stall? Another let’s try something else approach. Senators like Lugar are at least a year behind in their approach. Some talk deplomacy now and reference the Baker/Hamilton Report, well good-but strong action such as a withdraw date will send a strong message to the Iraq government along with a real effort directed at diplomacy. Senator Kerry has been on target with what needed to be done in Iraq for years now. He hasn’t played games with this issue, knowing our security and many lives are at stake. It is time for us to make those still supporting this war or even those suggesting another strategy without a withdraw date, feel even more heat. Armed with the comments and links you provided, we can challenge these “fence sitters” and demand they actually vote for real progress in Iraq.
What exactly did the democratic leaders like Pelosi and Reid think would happen if they sent the president a bill where he would get the funding he need for a surge that was not expected to succeed and benchmarks the president could waive? If the democratic leadership is serious about ending the war, they better show it soon. Lengthy speeches, photo ops, and crafty slogans are useless if they are not backed up with effective and binding legislation.
If the democratic leaders were so against the surge, why did they fund it if they knew it would fail? The democrats who are waiting for the Petraeus and Crocker report to Congress will be disappointed if they thought they would be straight about the lack of success with the surge. Their report will only ask for more time for a second surge. As for the republican lawmakers who are now against the president’s policy in Iraq, I wouldn’t hold my breath to see if they will stand with democrats on troop withdrawal legislation.
Excellent post. Why wait until September to begin question the merits of this catastrophic policy. The surge was a failure before it was implemented. It’s a failure not only in terms of the human costs, but also the billions being wasted on war: