Ice Sheets, Cribsheets and Climate Change

Following in the footsteps of a long line of Bush’s nominees, Michael Griffin, director of NASA, embarrassed himself with his inability to acknowledge that human-caused agents might have anything to do with climate change and global warming on NPR on Thursday. (Check out this ABC news story for reaction to his verbal gaffe.)

Despite the ignorance displayed by the director, NASA along with the Columbia University Earth Institute announced on Wednesday “that human-made greenhouse gases have brought the Earth’s climate close to critical tipping points, with potentially dangerous consequences for the planet.”

From a combination of climate models, satellite data, and paleoclimate records the scientists conclude that the West Antarctic ice sheet, Arctic ice cover, and regions providing fresh water sources and species habitat are under threat from continued global warming. The research appears in the current issue of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

Tipping points can occur during climate change when the climate reaches a state such that strong amplifying feedbacks are activated by only moderate additional warming. This study finds that global warming of 0.6ºC in the past 30 years has been driven mainly by increasing greenhouse gases, and only moderate additional climate forcing is likely to set in motion disintegration of the West Antarctic ice sheet and Arctic sea ice. Amplifying feedbacks include increased absorption of sunlight as melting exposes darker surfaces and speedup of iceberg discharge as the warming ocean melts ice shelves that otherwise inhibit ice flow.

The researchers used data on earlier warm periods in Earth’s history to estimate climate impacts as a function of global temperature, climate models to simulate global warming, and satellite data to verify ongoing changes. Lead author James Hansen, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, concludes: “If global emissions of carbon dioxide continue to rise at the rate of the past decade, this research shows that there will be disastrous effects, including increasingly rapid sea level rise, increased frequency of droughts and floods, and increased stress on wildlife and plants due to rapidly shifting climate zones.”
<!-more-> The article goes on to describe in a little more detail some of the study covered and its conclusions:

Based on climate model studies and the history of the Earth the authors conclude that additional global warming of about 1ºC (1.8ºF) or more, above global temperature in 2000, is likely to be dangerous. In turn, the temperature limit has implications for atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), which has already increased from the pre-industrial level of 280 parts per million (ppm) to 383 ppm today and is rising by about 2 ppm per year. According to study co-author Makiko Sato of Columbia’s Earth Institute, “the temperature limit implies that CO2 exceeding 450 ppm is almost surely dangerous, and the ceiling may be even lower.”

The study also shows that the reduction of non-carbon dioxide forcings such as methane and black soot can offset some CO2 increase, but only to a limited extent. Hansen notes that “we probably need a full court press on both CO2 emission rates and non-CO2 forcings, to avoid tipping points and save Arctic sea ice and the West Antarctic ice sheet.”

Why is saving the Arctic sea ice and the West Antarctic ice sheet critical?

Well, here’s a crib sheet on Climate Change produced by Seed Magazine that I think does a great job of summarizing critical points in the various factors which feed into the climate change equation in a simple graphic style. Yes, sometimes a picture is worth a 1000 words.

seed-cribsheet-climatechange-sm.jpg
Click for larger image

You can see there that the ice sheets are critical for reflecting light (and heat) back into space.

Maybe someone should send this graphic to Mr. Griffin. Looks like it might be straightforward enough.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -

  Sidenote: For those who appreciate a brush up on their various science classes, Seed has put together some good crib sheets on other topics as well. Check them out.

 

9 Comments

New comments for this entry are closed.

I’m not sure if anything will convince the flat earthers.  The only thing we can do is get the scientfic evidence out, over and over again, until people are convinced that they are being bamboozled by corrupt officials who are in the pockets of the oil and gas industry, and reject their tired outdated denials.

Thanks for the graph.

Posted by beachmom | 06/01/07, 09:59 AM EST

This is very scary stuff. The one thing that gives me hope is that leaders like Al Gore and John Kerry are speaking out on this. I just ran across an interview with Al Gore from last year in Rolling Stone, where he says that sometimes the political process can suddenly get moving and accomplish things that will astound you. He gave the example of how, in 1942, people would’ve thought it was insane to think that the US could build one thousand airplanes a month to fight WWII—but two years later, they were doing more than that. The key is to wake people up and get things moving, and that requires non-stop speaking out on the issue. I think that even something like keeping up a steady drumbeat on the blogs is crucial—so thank you for this scary but informative post.

Posted by noisy democrat | 06/01/07, 10:00 AM EST

I think that this is becoming more real to people because the changes associated with global climate change are starting to affect real lives.  People may not understand the science involved with this, but they understand that when 2 ‘100 year floods’ occur 11 months apart, that something is up.

Climate change means that health care costs are going to go up as people have to deal with more pollutants and allergens in their areas.  It means the cost of food will go up as the soil dries due to drought and it becomes harder to find water to irrigate the land. The price of insurance for certain properties that are in the line of possible hurricane paths will become unaffordable.

People grasp this issue when it is put into terms that they understand.  This is starting and I think this is why there is starting to be movement on this issue.

Posted by TayTay | 06/01/07, 10:13 AM EST

“Heckuva job there, Griffie”

Posted by marctrager | 06/01/07, 10:55 AM EST

When you have Kerry on the left-center and Gingrich on the right debating not IF but HOW to deal with climate change, this guy just looks silly.

Heck, even Bush reluctantly acknowledges mankind’s effect on the climate.  Of course, the earth would burst into flames and hell would freeze over before he’d do anything about it.  His non-proposal today to the G8 is a slap in the face.

http://tinyurl.com/2ao9f6

Posted by GV | 06/01/07, 03:16 PM EST

Here is the White House response to this embarrassing episode (heh, heh, heh):

White House Blames NASA Chief’s Global Warming Denial On His ‘Wry Sense Of Humor’

Posted by ProSense | 06/01/07, 06:04 PM EST

You know that emission control is a scam to make sure the poor people can not afford to have the freedom of working outside of or leavening their confined area. If it was actually a real thing that is if global warming were real more of the world would be stating that fact instead it is the us that has found a way of sucking more money out of the little guy and other power holding nations are just joining the money scam. It is so apparent that it has gone to far for them to state that it isn’t happening, it will throw such a dark shadow on the scientific community that no one will trust anything they say for awhile. Now it has become a monster that more and more people with power or money or both have started to slowly suck it for all its worth and I hope that someone will wake up and see it for what it is and the whole thing will come crashing down around their ears before it ends with the nation in 12th century and civil war dividing the country. Don,t get me wrong I think alternative fuel is a great idea but get real you can’t shove it down some ones throat at the cost of choking them to death either. But of course thats the whole point of emissions control isn’t it.

Posted by scott | 06/03/07, 09:23 AM EST

Posted by marctrager | June 1, 2007 2:55 PM:

You nailed it!

Posted by scott | June 3, 2007 1:23 PM:

scott,

I’m not even sure where you’re coming from to think that “emission control is a scam” but in any case, it is the US (under GW Bush) that has been resisting the rest of the developed world - the rest of the developed world is saying climate change is an issue, it is the US that wants to ignore it. You know that IPCC report that came out recently? That said this is a real problem and we’d better do something about it? Well, who is the IPCC anyway:
Wikipedia: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

people from over 130 countries contributed to the IPCC 4AR over the previous 6 years. These people included:

  * 2500+ scientific expert reviewers
  * 850+ Contributing authors
  * 450+ lead authors.

Of these, the contributors to the Working Group 1 report (including the summary for policy makers) included [10]

  * 600 authors from 40 countries
  * Over 620 expert reviewers
  * A large number of government reviewers
  * Representatives from 113 governments.

That doesn’t look like “just the US” to me. Especially considering GW is only this year owning up to it being a problem, and his department heads like Griffin evidently haven’t even gotten the memo yet.

Posted by MH | 06/03/07, 12:16 PM EST

“The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best is now.” Chinese proverb.

Posted by Tibor Kiss | 06/09/07, 01:49 AM EST