JK on Improving Conditions at Walter Reed
JK is responding to the story about the conditions at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. According to a statement released earlier this afternoon, he is joining with Senators Obama and McCaskill in introducing legislation aimed at improving conditions at the WRAMC. The focus of the proposed legislation is assisting patients in acquiring the counseling and rehabilitation services that they need.
WASHINGTON, DC – Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) announced today that he will co-sponsor legislation to improve the lives of recovering veterans at Walter Reed and other medical centers by eliminating paperwork and improving physical conditions. Kerry also said he would explore options for directing new funding to Walter Reed and to make immediate improvements to the buildings where veterans are housed.
Kerry said he was “saddened” by a recent Washington Post series exposing poor sanitary conditions and other hurdles faced by injured veterans returning to the states after service in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with a story in the Army Times about 15 month delays facing vets seeking a physical evaluation. The sponsors of the legislation are Sens. Obama and McCaskill.
The legislation that Kerry is co-sponsoring would do the following:
- Simplify the paperwork process for recovering soldiers
- Improve the ratio of caseworkers to recovering soldiers
- Increase the training of caseworkers
- Require more frequent IG inspections of hospital facilities and standards of care
- Establish timelines and benchmarks for repairs to substandard facilities
- Provide recovering soldiers with psychological counseling
- Require regular reporting to Congress on:
- the total number of recovering soldiers at military hospitals
- the number of caseworkers
- the average waiting time for treatment
- the number of suicide attempts, accidental deaths or drug overdoses
The Army Times published an article today titled “Wounded and Waiting”.
They tell another story of Walter Reed and the Veterans Administration and how they are overwhelmed by telling the story of Pvt. Robert Van Antwerp. The story points out that:
<!Soldiers go to VA to try for more benefits, but the department had a staggering 400,000-case backup on new claims in fiscal 2006, according to VA.
For that reason, Van Antwerp faces another wait at VA. Cases there have an average of a one-year wait. And this is important because it may take a while before Van Antwerp, who must carry a notebook to remember his daily chores, can make his way back to the work world.
Perhaps more important, many of the soldiers leaving Walter Reed face post-traumatic stress disorder. Studies have shown that if soldiers receive treatment within a year, they fare much better.
Van Antwerp has been a patient at Walter Reed since November 2005. He is one of 704 outpatient soldiers who are injured or ill and are waiting to make their way through the red tape of the medical evaluation board process at the medical center, according to officials there.
In a classroom at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, the first sergeant for the medical holding company lined up three soldiers to talk about their experience with the physical evaluation board. Soldiers going through the physical evaluation board process report to the medical holding company for accountability, to be assigned jobs that work with their injuries, and to have a first sergeant and company commander who can speak up for them when they’re having problems.
In August 2004, as Spc. Karl Unbehagan, 29, reported to his new unit at Fort Benning, Ga., he developed intense migraine headaches. Doctors told the infantry soldier he was not used to the humid weather. A couple of months later, they ran a CAT scan.
“I had a tumor in the third ventricle of my brain,” Unbehagan explained, pointing to the shunt that runs from the scar on his head down to his stomach to relieve the pressure in his brain. “They realized it had nothing to do with the weather.”
The physical evaluation board rated him at zero percent, saying the tumor was a pre-existing condition. Unbehagan has been in the Army for four years, and his doctors found no proof the tumor existed before he joined, he said.
Rather than face the civilian world with no benefits, he talked with a free counselor from Disabled American Veterans who told him how to fight the discharge, reclassify as an electronics and satellite repair specialist, and stay in the Army. The process took eight months, which he spent in the medical hold company.
His board was restarted three times: First, his medical profile was lost. Then, somebody forgot to counsel him — a required part of the process. And finally, no one made his file active after he changed his job field, so no one saved him a slot at the repair school, he said.
JK spoke out today:
“We owe our returning veterans a debt of gratitude, not sub-standard treatment at an overcrowded medical facility. The Administration has consistently talked a big game but shortchanged the needs of veterans. How can the president talk about a troop escalation in Iraq while failing to keep faith with the Iraq War veterans we’ve already brought home?
Brave men who have been blinded or lost a limb in Iraq should not be sitting in moldy, mouse-infested buildings. Period.
It’s unacceptable and this Congress needs to do something about it.”
Yes, it does and thanks to those taking immediate action to remedy this failure to care for our troops.


9 Comments
New comments for this entry are closed.
Thanks to all the senators who are putting forward this legislation to improve conditions for wounded, returning veterans. Thanks to them all, but thanks most of all to Senator Kerry who has been taking action to help veterans and their families for decades.
This is tragic and depressing. It’s unfathomable that conditions at Walter Reed were allowed to deteriorate to that level. Nothing about the way the troops on the ground or those returning from war are being treated remotely resembles support.
I hope Congress rallies to pass the legislation Sen. Kerry is co-sponsoring. There also has to be a thorough investigation into the conditions and where the breakdown occurred.
All of this make the Bush admin’s VA funding cuts more despicable.
More on the Army Times article at No Quarter blog.
So, Blair finally found the nerve to join (as Olbermann so aptly describes them), the ‘coalition of the leaving’. It’s about time he listened to the will of the people of his country.
Our turn.
ProSense, I saw speculation somewhere today that the reason Walter Reed was allowed to deteriorate was because it had made the BRAC list (base realignment and closure). Of course if the installation is about to be closed, people would not necessarily be putting money into fixing things. And yeah, putting Walter Reed on the BRAC list makes about as much sense as anything else in our current defense policy.
Back after 9/11 when Bush started talking about this long global “war on terror” (war without end?), among the dubious policies, including tax cuts for the wealthy, was to continue trying to close military bases. But to have a major military hospital on the closure list?
One thing’s for sure - decades from now, when historians are trying to make sense of this time period, they will have plenty to shake their heads in disbelief over.
I am really sadden by this story. Our troops deserve the best attention and long term care.
Is there anything we can do to help?
Jeanne:
Call your Senators and ask them to co-sponsor and support the legislation that Sens. Obama and McCaskill filed and that Sen. Kerry immediately co-sponsored.
Sen. Kerry mentioned many times last year in speeches that this war, in parts and in the whole, is immoral. This is an instance of where the the treatment of our veterans coming home with terrible wounds is also immoral. It is evidence, as if we needed any, that this was an inconsidered and ill-planned war from the very beginning.
The treatment of these good people was immoral. Flat out immoral. There is no excuse for the horrors detailed in those news articles. No excuse at all.
The women at Code Pink spoke out about the treatment of returning troops at Walter Reed at least a year ago. Other people knew. Those who worked at Walter Reed knew. I can only guess there was a person or persons inside/outside Walter Reed who worked very hard to keep this outrageous neglect contained.
MG Weightman 2/20/07:
“Information for this article was covertly obtained over more than 2 years by reporters who did not wish to bring their findings to the leadership for action. Many of the issues that were raised in the articles have been resolved or mitigated.”
Why chastise the reporters? Couldn’t (or wouldn’t) anyone who actually worked there “bring their findings to the leadership for action”? Who could’ve blocked the channels through which these findings might find their way to “leadership”?
This is criminal, this is not simply bureaucratic bungling. This is not merely “unacceptable.” This is a dark corner of the Defense Department that needs a sharp, clear light trained on it and that light should remain focused.
GV:
Coalition of the leaving? I did not hear that, great choice of words.
So, now who owes the troops in Iraq an apology? Who made the real “botched jokes” on veterans’ care, body armour, unprotected vehicles, and horrible food and sanitary conditions? The Bush Administration, led by GI George in his official GI Joe Action Pilot flight suit. Not to mention Deadeye Dick, once we can find him!
The Republican Party owes the troops an apology, for not focusing on terrorism or veterans’ care; instead they were obsessed with impeaching President Clinton.
John “Maverick” McCain owes the troops an apology, for being more concerned with Clinton/Gore fundraising and White House “coffees” (which other presidents had done), than with veterans’ needs.
The military personnel who participated in that smelly scheme with overseas and absentee ballots in the 2000 election—they also owe their wounded and disabled comrades an apology.
And let’s ask the “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth” why they have never told the truth about this administration’s sorry record in Iraq, and the Middle East generally! Do they care about the health and well-being of their fellow veterans? No, like their leader, John O’Neill (former hatchet man for Nixon), their so-called “lives” are defined by one issue alone: “We hate John Kerry!” That’s the essence of their patriotism—lies! They know that John Kerry, whether or not he becomes president, will go down in history as a true American hero, unlike them.
Senator Kerry has fought for veterans’ health care throughout his career, unlike Senator Obama, who suddenly realises he has to have a record in order to run for president.
Let’s hold all of them accountable, and see whether any apologies are forthcoming.
Thomas Chacko.