Scooter’s Get Out of Jail Free Card

President Bush’s abrupt commutation of the prison portion of convicted felon I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby’s sentence took a lot of people by surprise. It wasn’t the action itself that was surprising - nobody in Washington ever believed that the White House would let Scooter Libby spend a single night behind prison bars even after being convicted on five counts of obstruction of justice, perjury, and making false statements - but the timing of Mr. Bush’s intervention caught even members of his own inner circle unawares. Needless to say, tongues immediately started wagging across all parts of the political universe. Here’s what some of the key players on the Democratic side of the aisle had to say in response:

Senator John Kerry:

“President Bush’s eleventh hour commutation of Scooter Libby’s sentence makes a mockery of the justice system and betrays the idea that all Americans are expected to be held accountable for their actions, even close friends of Vice President Cheney. It’s a tragedy that with young Americans paying the ultimate price in Iraq for this administration’s mistakes, this White House continues to avoid accountability and reward deceit for their friends and supporters.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid:

“The president’s decision to commute Mr. Libby’s sentence is disgraceful. Libby’s conviction was the one faint glimmer of accountability for White House efforts to manipulate intelligence and silence critics of the Iraq War. Now, even that small bit of justice has been undone. Judge Walton correctly determined that Libby deserved to be imprisoned for lying about a matter of national security. The Constitution gives President Bush the power to commute sentences, but history will judge him harshly for using that power to benefit his own Vice President’s Chief of Staff who was convicted of such a serious violation of law.”
<!-more-> Senator Tom Harkin:

“We have known for a long time that this Administration has contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law, but today’s action by the President to intervene to save a high-ranking member of his Administration – who was found by a jury to have broken the law and obstructed justice, on behalf of the Vice President – is a new low. It shows that this President believes there is one set of rules for his friends, and another set for everyone else. The American people believe that government officials should be held to a higher standard. President Bush believes that his cronies should be held to no standard at all.”

Senator Richard Durbin:

“When it comes to the law, there should not be two sets of rules—one for President Bush and Vice President Cheney and another for the rest of America. Even Paris Hilton had to go to jail. No one in this administration should be above the law.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi:

“The President’s commutation of Scooter Libby’s prison sentence does not serve justice, condones criminal conduct, and is a betrayal of trust of the American people. The President said he would hold accountable anyone involved in the Valerie Plame leak case. By his action today, the President shows his word is not to be believed. He has abandoned all sense of fairness when it comes to justice, he has failed to uphold the rule of law, and he has failed to hold his Administration accountable.”

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer:

“The charges against Mr. Libby were not insubstantial; a jury convicted him of lying to authorities and obstructing the investigation into the public disclosure of a CIA operative’s identity. In the last election, accountability for wrongdoing was a major issue. With this decision today in the Libby case, the President continues to demonstrate that he rejects accountability for wrongdoing in his Administration.”

Representative John Conyers:

“Until now, it appeared that the President merely turned a blind eye to a high ranking Administration official leaking classified information. The President’s action today makes it clear that he condones such activity. This decision is inconsistent with the rule of law and sends a horrible signal to the American people and our intelligence operatives who place their lives at risk everyday. Now that the White House can no longer argue that there is a pending criminal investigation, I expect them to be fully forthcoming with the American people about the circumstances that led to this leak and the President’s decision today.”

Representative Tom Lantos:

“This decision sends the wrong message about the rule of law in the United States, just as the president is meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. How can we hold the line against injustices in other countries when our own executive branch deliberately sets out to smear its critics, lies about it and then wriggles away without having to pay the price in prison?”

DNC Chairman Howard Dean:

“Once again President Bush and the GOP have undermined a core American value: equal justice under the law for every American. By commuting this sentence, President Bush is sending a clear message that the rules don’t apply to the Bush White House or loyal Republican cronies. After promising that anyone who violated the law would be ‘taken care of,’ President Bush instead handed Scooter Libby a get out of jail free card.

Though Libby was convicted by a jury of lying about a matter of national security, President Bush is sparing him the consequences ordinary Americans would face. This conviction was the first moment of justice in a Bush Administration void of accountability. It’s a sad day for America when the President once again puts protecting his friends ahead of equal justice under the law.”

9 Comments

New comments for this entry are closed.

There is a pattern to the pathetic practice.
What difference does it make anyway?

George Bush commuted “Scooter” Libby’s sentence in 2007; Bill & Hill Clinton pardoned Marc Rick in 2000.

It doesn’t make any difference; the Bush and the Clinton political dynasties have always taken Americans for a ride by ensuring that their friends, donors, and relatives get away with crimes.  Whether it’s obstruction of justice by Scooter Libby or tax evasion by Marc Rich.

Some Hill & Bill Clinton’s 2000 pardon include the following:
• Marc Rich, a fugitive, was pardoned of tax evasion. Denise Rich, Marc’s former wife, was a close friend of the Clintons and had made substantial donations to both Clinton’s library and Hillary’s Senate campaign. According to Paul Volcker’s independent investigation of Iraqi Oil-for-Food kickback schemes, Marc Rich was a middleman for several suspect Iraqi oil deals involving over 4 million barrels of oil.
• Carlos A. Vignali had his sentence for cocaine trafficking commuted, after serving 6 of 15 years in federal prison.
• Almon Glenn Braswell was pardoned of his mail fraud and perjury convictions, even while a federal investigation was underway regarding additional money laundering and tax evasion charges. Braswell and Carlos Vignali each paid approximately $200,000 to Hillary Clinton’s brother, Hugh Rodham, to represent their respective cases for clemency. Hugh Rodham returned the payments after they were disclosed to the public. Braswell would later invoke the Fifth Amendment at a Senate Committee hearing in 2001, when questioned about allegations of his having systematically defrauded senior citizens of millions of dollars.
• Susan McDougal, who had already completed her sentence, was pardoned for her role in the Whitewater scandal; McDougal had served 18 months on contempt charges for refusing to testify about Clinton’s role.
• Dan Rostenkowski, a former Democratic Congressman convicted in the Congressional Post Office Scandal. Rostenkowski had served his entire sentence.
• Melvin J. Reynolds, a Democratic Congressman from Illinois, who was convicted of bank fraud, 12 counts of sexual assault, obstruction of justice, and solicitation of child pornography had his sentence commuted on the bank fraud charged and was allowed to serve the final months under the auspices of a half way house. He had served his entire sentence on child sex abuse charges before the commutation of the later convictions.
• Roger Clinton, the president’s half-brother, on drug charges after having served the entire sentence more than a decade before. Roger Clinton would be charged with drunk driving and disorderly conduct in an unrelated incident within a year of the pardon. He was also briefly alleged to have been utilized in lobbying for the Braswell pardon, among others.

Posted by F.Igwealor | 07/03/07, 01:19 PM EST

Mr. Igwealor, that’s a lot of cut and paste.  Thank goodness for wikipedia, huh?
 
As you note, in most cases the people Clinton pardoned, unlike Scooter Libby, had served all or part of their sentence.

Bush I pardoned damn near the whole Iran Contra criminal gang and quite a few other pretty shady characters.  76 in total.  Bush the Lesser is currently beating dad’s record, although he’s been at it longer.

Hell, Ford pardoned Nixon. That one was uncalled for.
Pardons happen and I agree with you that they’re not always warranted. But to list Clinton’s and not the others is a bit disingenuous, don’t you think?   

http://tinyurl.com/3b4k3y

The difference is that Libby was a high ranking government official who lied during the investigation of the outing of a covert CIA agent, and served no jail time.  Had he served until the end of Bush’s term and then been pardoned, I doubt there would be the same level of outrage.  But he didn’t serve a single day.  What message does that send?

No, Mr Igwealor.  Not the same as the Clinton pardons.  Not even close.

Posted by GV | 07/03/07, 03:24 PM EST

I’m with GV on this one. That was a nice copy and paste job on the same old same old rightist talking points—well, okay, so with the exception of the extra typos and misspellings and grammatical errors, ahem—but that’s exactly what it is: a repaste of stuff that other people listed out for folks like you to say, none of which has any relevance to the Scooter Libby case or any of the other related examples of egregious imperial excess on the part of the current administration. So while I suppose you should get some credit for at least making the effort, Mr. I., that retreaded lame duck logic ain’t gonna fly in places where these pesky darn annoyingly-factual reality-based genuine bloggers like GV hang out.

Posted by Otter | 07/03/07, 04:51 PM EST

Pardons and sentence commutations are not uncommon for presidents. But the president should have stayed out of this case due to a direct conflict of interest. This instance is unique because the president commuted the sentence of someone who is a former staffer. Libby a convicted felon, was a White House insider. He was one of the architects or advocates of the Iraq war in the run up to the war.

The utter disregard for the rule of law and our justice system is both astonishing in one respect but it is also not surprising considering the track record of this administration. My hope is that while Congress can’t undo the president’s actions, hopefully they can now investigate Plamegate, hold hearings on what role key members of the administration played in the outing of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame.

Posted by Probus | 07/03/07, 05:33 PM EST

I could not agree more, especially with Senator Kerry’s comments.

Posted by Jessica L Szabo | 07/03/07, 06:44 PM EST

The commutation of Libby’s jail time has everything to do with the Bush administrations disregard for the law when it directly affects one of their own and nothing at all to do with the Clinton Administration.
It was a platform of patriotism, honesty and morality that Bush ran on in 2000 and 2004.  He and his party claimed to hold the high ground on these issues. They declared that corruption was the way of the Democrats, not the Republicans. And, that is why what President Bush has done is frightening. How could our President ignore the final verdict of a judge and jury, ignore Congress and the American people and commute the sentence of a man convicted of lying to the FBI and under oath? A man who may have put our country’s security in peril and had a part in misleading the American people on the facts about the circumstances leading up to the war in Iraq? 
President Bush’s decision yesterday, IMO, sent a clear message to the American public and it wasn’t one of honest or morality. It was a message of corruption at the very top. And it put us on notice that this administration does, in fact ,consider itself above the laws of this land.

Posted by wisteria | 07/03/07, 07:28 PM EST

All are NOT equal under the law in the so-called democratic countries as far as I can see.  Ability to pay for the best legal representation has a huge effect on the jury’s verdict.

In Libby’s case, I make the assumption that the absolute best possible legal representation was made for him.  And, even so, with the very best, he failed.  He was convicted by a jury of his peers.  To me, this counts as a double-edged conviction.  Even with one of the best lawyers available, Libby couldn’t convince a jury of his innocence.  He couldn’t even convince them of reasonable doubt, it seems.

If President Bush had any respect at all for his own party people, for all the people who voted for him, for the poor and weak and downtrodden, if he had just a tiny smidgeon of respect for them, he’d have upheld the conviction and sentence as it stood.  It never fails to astound us on other continents that the country that professes all are equal under the law, makes it painfully clear that the adage is simply untrue.  It follows then, that others must also be untrue.  And we set about wondering what they are.

A Presidential Pardon is a Presidential Insult!

Posted by woz | 07/03/07, 09:16 PM EST

An additional set of quotes from somebody who really ought to know—Joseph Wilson himself:

-

Bush’s commutation provoked outrage from Democrats and former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, husband of the former CIA operative.

Wilson suggested the president made himself “an accessory to obstruction of justice.”

“I think this administration has demonstrated time and time again it is corrupt from the top to the bottom. I think the president short-circuited the rule of law and the system of justice that has undergirded this country in the entire history of the republic,” Wilson told CNN’s “American Morning.”

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald “has said from the very beginning that the reason he was not able to get to an underlying crime was because Mr. Libby repeatedly lied,” Wilson said.

Wilson and his wife have filed a civil suit in the case. “We want to get the truth out and hold these officials to account for their abuse of power.”

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/03/libby.sentence/index.html

Posted by Otter | 07/04/07, 05:57 AM EST

I have come to realize that Osama Bin Laden and Scooter Libby both have received a get out of jail free card.  The only difference is Libby’s was made public.

Posted by Chad | 07/11/07, 03:58 PM EST