Support America’s Workers

The formation of American unions was a boon to this nation. Not only were they a boon to the workers of this nation by their work instituting things we now take for granted (the 8-hour day, weekends, basic health and safety standards), but the effect their work had on spreading the prosperity around the American people laid the foundation for decades of unprecedented prosperity.

We all know that unions have been under siege. There are many reasons given for that (globalization, changing employment patterns, etc), and many of them do have an effect. However, the rules are stacked against unions. It can be extraordinarily difficult to hold free and fair elections when the question of whether or not to form a union is concerned. Workplace intimidation is a real phenomenon, and enforcement of the regulations that are supposed to make things like that illegal can be lax with an administration like the one currently in the White House. Even in the best of times, it’s a very tricky thing to create a fair election. <!-more-> For example, even though the NLRA (National Labor Relations Act of 1935) allows employers to recognize a union when presented with signatures from a majority of its employees, many employers choose instead to call for secret elections. Before the election, employers can hire anti-union consultants, conduct an unlimited number of employee meetings, and bar labor representatives from the workplace. Too often, employers also use illegal yet hard-to-prove tactics to pressure employees to change their vote including threatening disciplinary action or conversely promising wage increases and benefit to individual employees in order to change their vote. Even when employers are found to have violated the NLRA, its penalties are so insignificant that is it often more worthwhile for an employee to fire union organizers and intimate workers.

In 2005 alone, the National Labor Relations Board reported that 31,358 workers were disciplined or fired for union activity.

John Kerry announced today his strong support for legislation designed to correct this situation. The Employee Free Choice Act will require employers to recognize a union when they are presented with the signatures of a majority of the workers of the union. Again, from a majority of the workers. This is about recognizing the will of the majority of employees before the standard tactics of intimidation and misinformation are employed to try to sway the outcome of elections. It’s reinstating the respect for a clean and fair process in the forming of collective bargaining units.

The Congressional Research Service has reported that workers have a greater success in forming unions with automatic card check recognition than with secret ballot. And history has shown that workers with unions are better off than workers without the rights to collective bargaining.

Here is the full text of the press release from the Senator on this:

Washington D.C. – Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.) pushed for passage of the Employee Free Choice Act, which will remove barriers for workers trying to organize. The legislation will mandate that employers recognize a majority vote by workers who want to form a union. Senator Kerry is an original co-sponsor of this legislation.

“The right of American workers to organize has been at the foundation of every march forward for working people in the history of our country,” Senator Kerry said. “The current law provides too many opportunities for employers to impose disincentives, hire anti-union consultants, or simply refuse to bargain when they don’t like the outcome of a vote. Union membership increases wages and improves benefits and makes sure that our workers and their families are treated fairly. After seven years of the White House giving tax away the store to powerful interests at the expense of working Americans, it’s long past time for Washington and our Democratic majority to uphold the rights, and listen to the voices of working Americans.”

In 2005, the National Labor Relations Board reported that 31,358 workers were disciplined or fired for union activity. The current law, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), serves as a foundation for modern labor rights, but includes a number of loop holes for employers. For one, the law does not adequately protect workers from employers that call for secret elections and then use coercion to pressure their workers from casting a pro-union vote. Even when employers are found to have violated the NLRA, its penalties are so insignificant that is it often more worthwhile for an employee to fire union organizers and intimate workers.

The Employee Free Choice Act fixes this problem by requiring the National Labor Relations Board, and by extension, employers, to recognize a union when a majority of employees have signed their names to authorization cards and present them to the Board. The bill also includes, for the first time, substantial fines for employers that engage in union busting activities, and requires binding arbitration if an employer and a newly formed union cannot agree to an initial contract.

Studies show unionized workers are paid 28 percent more than non-union workers, 92 percent of unionized workers have some health care coverage, and 3 out of 4 have defined benefit retirement plans—compared to 1 in 6 non-union members.

4 Comments

New comments for this entry are closed.

Gee, does Senator Kerry back undocumented, another word for law breaking, union member workers and their families also? (Of course.) Buy Prius?  Buy American?  Unionize illegals?  Free trade?  Fair trade?  U.S. or global citizen?  Good people or bad people?

Posted by Human Citizen | 06/19/07, 08:02 PM EST

Human Citizen, your comment doesn’t make much sense on the face of it.

Are you saying that union members and their families break laws? That union members are undocumented somethings-or-other? (I assume you meant undocumented workers, but that’s not clear from your remarks.)  That Kerry wants to unionize illegal somethings-or-other, too?

Are you saying that buying a Prius would be un-American? (That would be ironic, since 3/4 of all Toyotas and 4/4 of all Prius vehicles are produced here in America by American workers, ahem.)

Are you saying that free trade can’t be fair, and that fair trade can’t be free? That U.S. citizens should be separate from the rest of the world’s inhabitants by default, and vice versa? And what does any of this have to do with who qualifies as being “good” people” as opposed to “bad” people?

Are you also claiming to be the arbiter of who is good versus who is bad? If so, on what grounds? Last time I checked, that higher authority was a lot farther up the food chain than any of us here can deign to be.

Those are some mighty sweeping statements you made in this comment, Human Citizen. Where’s your justification for them? Or is this just an unfocused drive-by posting that we shouldn’t bother taking seriously?

Posted by Otter | 06/20/07, 04:09 AM EST

I am tired of people thinking of union members as lazy people with no skills. According to Federal Government guidelines in the Department of Labor, a pipefitter (me) needs at least 5 years of apprenticeship to learn the BASICS of the trade. I was the first woman in AZ to graduate from the apprenticeship program, the first to become a foreman, and the first to become an instructor to apprentices. Because of my background as a teacher and my high level math skills, I taught pipetrades math for 11 semesters. That requires Geometry, Algebra and Trig. The new law allowing “guest workers” into “low skill trades” includes my craft. That makes me very angry. I have a degree as a teacher, but what I learned as an apprentice was much more rigorous, not to mention useful, than what I learned at the university. Sad, isn’t it? People think that a size 3 hat and a size 18 collar will get you any job in construction. So not true! Just wait till YOUR toilet overflows or your lights go out. Whom will you call? Good luck with that.

P.S. People are sometimes upset with the payscale for union members. Why aren’t they upset when a CEO, who is being forced out for poor management, is given a $6 million severance package? Talk about not logical.

Posted by Mary Cook | 06/23/07, 01:48 PM EST

That was one h*ll of a rebuttal, Otter.

Kudos.  Especially for having the patience to respond to something so incoherent.

Posted by Nobby | 06/24/07, 07:15 AM EST